by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
In 1897 a California court refused to accept testimony of a Subject who had been hypnotized. People vs Eubanks. The 1950’s Cornell case established that a person can be hypnotized for their own defense. In 1963 the California supreme court ruled that a lower...
by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
Spanos, Nicholas P.; Cross, Wendi P.; Lepage, Mark; Coristine, Marjorie (1986). Glossolalia as learned behavior: An experimental demonstration. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 21-23. 60 Ss listened to a 60-s sample of glossolalia (defined to them as...
by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
“To conclude, we will stress that the psychological mechanism of hypnotic induction is exactly _the same_ in everyday life and in the experimental environment. The apparent differences like [sic] in the _behavior_ of the subject in the hypnotic state, and are...
by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
NOTES 1: This book summarizes research on preconscious activation (subliminal psychodynamic activation) of fantasies of oneness, following tachistoscopic presentation of words like, “Mommy and I are one.” It represents an attempt to test and validate,...
by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
NOTES 1: “For the sake of maintaining historical accuracy, I would like first to remark that the ability of hypnotized Ss to resist suggestions was probably never a central issue in the Nancy-Salpetriere controversy. The main quarrel was about other fundamental...
