by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
This result has been replicated. It is therefore important to run Ss across an entire quarter or year. The present study differs from the foregoing study. It addresses the question: Do life events affect scores on the Harvard Scale? Do tension, uncertainty, etc....
by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
In their Discussion, the authors note that “The three hypotheses were supported by the results. Several of the absorption group comparisons obtained in previous research (Pekala et al., 1985) involving alterations in subjective experience (body image,...
by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
In the Discussion section the authors note, “the relative difficulty of the items is comparable to that observed in other studies, except for Items 3 and 8. The reliability of the present version is somewhat less than that of the others, both with regard to the...
by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
A scale is presented that assesses subjective experiences associated with the test suggestions contained in the Waterloo-Stanford Group C scale (WSGC), a group adaptation of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form [C] (SHSS:C). This scale, along with the...
by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
1994 Sapp, Marty (1994). The effects of guided imagery on reducing the worry and emotionality components of test anxiety [Abstract]. Journal of Mental Imagery, 18 (3&4), 165-180. This study investigated the effects of guided imagery on reducing the worry and...
by Joe | Feb 19, 2016
He compared hypnotic attention with hypnotic obstruction (which was a suggestion that a brick wall was “covering” the L or R visual field). They found a difference between attended and ignored stimuli in the Frontal area ERP! However, there are problems...
